The Starfield PS5 Petition Is Incredibly Dumb, Yet Kinda Right
In great idiocy, we can find great wisdom.
In great idiocy, we can find great wisdom.
... and I still don't think it's worth it.
Saying that a dev doesn’t care about the game because of a start screen is the worst kind of over-analysis.
The comparisons between Starfield and Baldur's Gate 3 have already begun.
The dangers and opportunities that come with nightfall are a great part of the RPG experience.
And also on smuggling organs, if that's your thing.
Another realistic imsim, who would have thought?
There's a lot to do out there in space.
With Baldur’s Gate 3 and Starfield coming out a mere month apart, some hard decisions have to be made.
Bethesda's track record for romance ain't great, so best keep things short and sweet.
The debates are getting a bit cringeworthy, to be honest.
AMD's refusal to comment about whether its deal blocks Nvidia's DLSS is a tad worrying.
I can't wait to go on mining expeditions without looking over my shoulder all the time.
Is humanity just 300 short years from discovering life on Mars?
A mostly lifeless cosmos is expected, but the settled parts really need to shine.
Todd Howard didn't confirm Steam Deck support for Starfield, but he also didn't completely shut the idea down...
Todd Howard reveals that only 10% of planets will support life.
Starfield is certainly loved, but for all the wrong reasons.
From the stiff animations to the dialogue ‘power-zoom,’ Starfield looks every bit the goofy Bethesda RPG.
A proper overhead building view is a start, but there’s more work to be done in overcoming Fallout 4’s flawed base-building.